Train the whole team before the next inspection
Seat licences for the department or the site, a manager view of progress and results, and completion records exported for the training matrix. Hosted on The GMP Training Academy.
Against the classroom course you were quoted
Budget holders compare on total cost, not list price. This does the comparison honestly, including the time your people spend away from the line.
Compare with the classroom course you were quoted
Enter your numbers. Nothing is stored. Time off site is counted for both options, and the online course is charged at its 2 hours of study, not zero.
- Classroom fees (12 × €1,400)
- €16,800
- Classroom time off site (12 × 2 d × €450)
- €10,800
- Classroom total
- €27,600
- Online seats (12 × €152, 5 to 19 seats, 15% off)
- €1,824
- Online study time (2 h each)
- €1,440
- Online total
- €3,264
You keep
€24,336
and nobody leaves the site for two days before the inspection.
Trained people make fewer defects, close faster and stay.
Regulators treat training as part of the quality system, not a favour to staff: EU GMP Chapter 2 requires it, requires its effectiveness to be assessed, and requires the records to prove it. The evidence says the same thing in numbers. Below: what the published studies found, what it looks like on your management review KPIs, and the clause behind it.
41%
fewer quality defects
in the most engaged teams compared with the least engaged, across 112,000 business units. Engagement and development opportunities are measured together. [1]
26%
greater ability to deliver quality products
in organisations with a strong learning culture compared with those without. [2]
37%
higher employee productivity
in the same strong-learning-culture organisations; output per person, not hours. [2]
94%
would stay longer
of employees, at a company that invests in their learning. Retention is the quality metric nobody puts on the dashboard. [3]
The management review KPIs a trained team moves
These are the numbers an inspector reads off your review minutes and action log, and the ones a head of quality answers for. No invented percentages here: measure yours over the last two review cycles and again after the next two, and you will have your own.
- 01
Reviews held on schedule
Measured as: % of planned reviews held within the defined interval
Higher is better
A team that knows what the review is for stops treating it as a meeting to postpone. The interval is set in the procedure, the calendar follows it, and a slipped review is a deviation, not a habit.
- 02
Inputs complete at the meeting
Measured as: % of required inputs presented, against the input list in the procedure
Higher is better
Owners who know which clause requires their input, and what a usable input looks like, bring trended data with a conclusion instead of a slide of counts. Missing inputs stop being discovered by the inspector.
- 03
Actions closed on time
Measured as: % of review actions closed by their due date
Higher is better
Actions written with a verifiable deliverable, an owner and a realistic date get closed. Actions written as intentions roll from review to review until an inspector asks why.
- 04
Decisions with a named owner and date
Measured as: % of recorded decisions carrying an owner and a due date
Higher is better
The minute taker and the chair learn the difference between a discussion and a decision. Every output the clause requires is recorded as one, so the minutes prove the review did its job.
- 05
Recurring findings across reviews
Measured as: count of topics raised at three or more consecutive reviews without resolution
Lower is better
Trained reviewers ask whether last cycle's action worked, not just whether it closed. Chronic topics get a root cause and a resourced decision instead of another line in the minutes.
- 06
Senior management attendance
Measured as: % of reviews attended by the site head and the required functional heads
Higher is better
When the review produces decisions the site head has to make, the site head attends. Delegation to deputies falls and the review carries the authority the regulations assume it has.
Ready to build the case for your manager?
Enrol in two to three hours of self-paced study, or send your manager the one-pager.
Sources
- [1]Gallup (2020). The Relationship Between Engagement at Work and Organizational Outcomes: Q12 Meta-Analysis, 10th edition. 112,312 business units in 96 countries. Top-quartile business units on engagement showed 41% fewer quality defects, 81% lower absenteeism and 18% to 43% lower turnover than bottom-quartile units. Cross-industry meta-analysis. Gallup's engagement measure includes development and learning opportunities.
- [2]Bersin and Associates (2010). High-Impact Learning Culture: The 40 Best Practices for Creating an Empowered Enterprise. Organisations with a strong learning culture were 26% more able to deliver quality products, showed 37% greater employee productivity and were 46% more likely to be first to market. Cross-industry survey of about 40,000 organisations.
- [3]LinkedIn Learning (2018). Workplace Learning Report: The Rise and Responsibility of Talent Development in the New Labor Market. 94% of employees would stay longer at a company that invested in their career development. Cross-industry employee survey.
- [4]EudraLex Volume 4, EU Guidelines for Good Manufacturing Practice, Part I, Chapter 2: Personnel (2013), paragraphs 2.10 to 2.13. ICH Q10 Pharmaceutical Quality System (2008), section 2.4 Resource management. The regulatory requirement for training and for assessing its effectiveness.
Seats, oversight, records
- One seat per learner, assigned by the manager, transferable before first login
- Manager view: progress, assessment results by module, certificates issued
- Completion export (CSV) formatted for the training matrix
- Certificates with verifiable IDs an auditor can check
- Content mapped to your SOP numbers on request
- Optional live Q&A session with the course author for the team
Per seat, by tier
| 1 to 4 seats | List price | €179 |
| 5 to 19 seats | 15% off | €152 |
| 20 to 49 seats | 25% off | €134 |
| 50 seats and above | 35% off | €116 |
Tiers apply at checkout on the academy. Site-wide and multi-course agreements on request.
Tell us the seat count and the deadline
A person replies within two working days with a quote, or you can buy seats directly on the academy.